spell integrity

[Owlet]

'm trying to get a book publshed, and I was wondering if a spell for publishing that I found in The Only Wiccan Spellbook You'll Ever Need would be morally correct, or would it be using magick for an unfair advantage?

[LONGGONEDEADFORUMS]

I doubt we're able to ask Amber K questions anymore on behalf of our members.

But...

It's something you have to make up with yourself, if you think it's morally and eticly correct to do use a spell for your own advantage. It also all depends on if you believe in faith and karma, and which points of view you have on personal gain.

Personally, if I had written a book and was trying to get it published, I wouldn't use a spell, I wouldn't want an advantage compared to other people just because I know magick, I would want my book released cause it's good, not because of magick.

[Kirree]

It's all up to you, honestly. Just because the spell looks legit doesn't mean it'll work as planned. You must understand all the consequences of what might happen. I've never heard of this book of yours and I'm not sure who it's author is or if it's a respectable source.

In all honesty, I wouldn't bother. If you were meant to publish this book of yours, it should be done by normal means. If you are meant to publish it, then it will be published. And not by a spell but by your talent as a writer.

Spells may or may not work as you think they would. Just because you cast this spell of yours doesn't mean that once you're done your book will be magickally published. The world doesn't work that way.

I would personally like to see my book published (when I decide to publish) for my talent and not by a spell I cast.

[Owlet]

Question #2: IS it ethically right to do a healing spell for someone wh's unable to consent? My cousin's aunt is in a coma, and she obviously can't express her views on a healing spell done on her behalf.

[LONGGONEDEADFORUMS]

depends on what you think. I doubt physical healing will do much though.

In my case I would perform the healing.